Conflict simulation, peacebuilding, and development

Gaming the “Arab Spring”, Part 1


Corinne Goldberger, an Honours student in political science at McGill University, has taken on the challenge this term of designing an educational board game that explores the “Arab Spring,”—that is, the wave of protests and uprising that swept the Arab world in 2011, and which continue to have profound ramifications for the region. I will be supervising her work. As part of the project, she has offered to post some periodic reflections to PAXsims on her conceptual ideas for the game, design choices, and revisions. You’ll find her first contribution below.

In our discussion of game mechanics, one of the issues that came through was the need to keep it simple so that the game was accessible to players without much board gaming experience. As you’ll see in future posts, she is leaning in the direction of using  a card-driven game design to address this. In an educational setting, CDGs have the advantage that you can place the relevant rules on each card, so that a player can immediately determine their game options without having to pour through a long, complicated rule book. The cards themselves can also contain some contextual information of educational value, and this can then be expanded upon in additional reference materials.

If this game is to be played in an educational setting, it should ideally not take too long to play either. That will be a consideration she will need to address in future, as she develops her game system.

Game design is about modelling the world by identifying key variables and relationships, and refining that model so that it is simple enough to be represented in playable form. As you’ll see below, the first choice Corinne had to make concerned who would be represented in the game.

In the case of the regimes, she chose to include the monarchies and republics as different players, reflecting a broader debate within the political science literature as to whether monarchical regime type was, or was not, an important factor in shaping the resilience of Arab authoritarian regimes. She opted to include the monarchies as a single player in this case because of the extent to which the royals have stuck together in recent political crises, whether by providing aid or (in the case of Bahrain) even sending military forces to buttress fellow monarchies under threat. The republics, on the other hand, are a more diverse group, a characteristic she hopes to represent in their somewhat victory conditions.

In the case of the opposition, she chose to include both Islamist and secular/liberal players. It would be dangerous to see this as an absolute dichotomy (or, as Egypt has recently shown, to believe that the “liberals” are always all that liberal). However, it is also clear that in both Egypt and Tunisia that differences between the two have deeply affected transitional politics. In game terms, she’ll need to come up with a design that pushes that elicits both cooperative and competitive behaviour from them.


* * *

Post #1: Some initial thoughts

Corinne Goldberger, McGill University

e01_08967231Over the past few years I have had the pleasure of being introduced to the world of gaming, wargaming, and simulations by Professor Brynen. From the hour-long class simulation of class struggle in colonial times, to the infamous week-long Brynania peacebuilding simulation, to play-testing games for fun in my barely existent spare time, it would be fair to say I’ve gotten pretty hooked. Throughout our many game debriefs, we always discuss the difficulty of creating these games in a way that is fun, playable, and yet analytically and historically accurate. Intrigued, I approached Professor Brynen with the idea of creating a board game myself as an independent study course.

My name is Corinne Goldberger, and I am a fourth-year student at McGill University. I am in my last semester of an Honours degree in Political Science, with a strong focus on contemporary Middle East politics. I am also minoring in Middle East Languages, studying both Arabic and Hebrew. I have had an extremely interesting lens into the Middle East the past few years as a university student studying the region; I have written nearly a dozen undergraduate (and some graduate) papers on the Arab Spring and the literature surrounding it. The subject of the game I wanted to create was therefore clear and very exciting.


The board game will attempt to simulate the events of the Arab Spring. I know that this is a huge task, with countless explanations having been posited for every aspect of the revolutions – or lack thereof, and I anticipate many design changes to my current thoughts in the future. Nonetheless, I hope to be able to create a game that is playable for fun, yet also useable in an educational setting. The game is targeted primarily at university students and will hopefully take approximately three hours to play.


Bahrain-protest_1905376bThe first big game-design challenge I have faced was in picking how many players my game would have, and who the players would represent. In my conversations with Professor Brynen we went through a number of possible options: a two-player game in which one player was the monarchical regimes and the other was the republican regimes, to be played against systemic opposition (in a Pandemic-esque way). Another idea was a four-player game in which different opposition groups struggled against the system of authoritarianism. The idea here would be to model that even with the same goal of “overthrowing regimes” priorities and methods varied and cooperation is to some extent necessary but extremely difficult. We briefly forayed into the idea of a five-player game, combining elements of the above two and adding the idea of a third group of “fence-sitters,” or a business-class, that has undetermined allegiance at the beginning of the game.

Ultimately, we decided on a four-player game in which one player is the monarchical regimes, one player is the republican regimes, one player is the secular/liberal opposition, and the final player is the Islamist opposition. With this formulation I hope to be able to show the greatest amount of analytically different factors and how they affect different actors. It differentiates between some opposition ideologies and also distinguishes different goals and methods of the two dominant regime types in the Middle East prior to 2011. The precise ways in which these differences will be played out have yet to be determined. This set-up builds in some necessity for cooperation in order to succeed, but also integrates competition between cooperating players. The game could be easily expanded to include eight students, with each player being played by a team of two-students.

Aspects of the Game

Thus far very few game mechanics have been fleshed out, but there are a number of real-life aspects that I hope to be able to simulate in some way in the game. Each of these aspects will be elaborated upon as I begin to figure out how to represent them, but for now, here is a partial list of elements of the dynamics of the Arab Spring I hope to capture:

  1. Repression
  2. Domino-effects
  3. Challenges of cooperation
  4. Need for activists to mobilize the population based on popular grievances
  5. Need for critical mass of protesters
  6. Ideological differences
  7. Regime policy responses to opposition
  8. Small-scale combat
  9. Role of military
  10. Money/oil
  11. Role of the media
  12. Role of business class
  13. Role of regional actors
  14. Role of external actors
  15. NGOs

Future Plans

The next step will be broadly figuring out the game mechanics and how to include as many of the above elements as possible, while still keeping the game simple enough for students who enter with little knowledge of the Middle East or the Arab Spring.

Corinne Goldberger 

2 responses to “Gaming the “Arab Spring”, Part 1

  1. Robert Hossal 26/01/2014 at 7:20 pm

    Sounds like a very ambitious project, looking forward to seeing where this goes! Good luck to you, Corinne.

  2. tedt1 25/01/2014 at 6:44 pm

    The game sounds very interesting. You could also have rules for a 2 player variant combining the monarchist/republican side and the secularist/Islamic side.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: